BlueLine gif Hard Rule

OPI gifESEA Title I, Part F, Comprehensive School Reform

Home   

Spacer Gif
 
Document Location: www.opi.mt.gov/CSRD/index.html
Last Modified: 8/31/07

Overview
Retains, without major changes, the current program to support the development, adoption, and implementation of comprehensive school reforms that are based on reliable research and effective practice and that will improve the academic achievement of children in participating schools.

Changes from Current Law

  • Authorization – Creates a separate authorization for the program in the ESEA (under Title I, new Part F). Previously, the program had no separate statutory authorization; it was created in the Department’s fiscal year 1998 appropriations act and was implemented based on instructions included in the reports accompanying the Department’s fiscal year 1998 and 1999 appropriations. Congress has appropriated funds for the program under Part E (Federal Evaluations, Demonstrations, and Transition Projects) of Title I and Part A (Fund for the Improvement of Education) of Title X.
  • Targeting – Limits awards to LEAs that receive funding under Part A of Title I. By comparison, the FY 2001 appropriations made 83 percent of the funding available for LEAs eligible to receive funds under Part A.
  • Additional Reform Component – In addition to the nine components required currently, adds two new components stipulating that grantees use program funds for comprehensive reforms that: (1) have been found (a) through scientifically based research to improve significantly the academic performance of participating students compared to non-participating students; or (b) show strong evidence that the model would significantly improve the performance of participating students; and (2) provide support for teachers, principals, administrators, and other school staff.
  • Quality Initiatives – Requires the Secretary to carry out “quality initiatives” consisting of: (1) a public-private effort to assist States, LEAs, and schools in making informed decisions in approving or selecting providers of comprehensive school reform; and (2) activities to (a) foster the development of comprehensive school reform models; and (b) provide effective capacity building for comprehensive school reform providers to expand their work to more schools, ensure quality, and promote financial stability.
  • Emphasis on Proven Strategies – Requires that grantees implement comprehensive reforms based on scientifically based research.

Related Links

Accountability

Allocation of Funds

Set-Asides



Contacts:
Ron Lukenbill, Director, Comprehensive School Reform,(406) 444-2080
Accountability
  • Federal – Requires national evaluation of, among other things, results achieved by schools after 3 years of implementing comprehensive school reforms and the effectiveness of comprehensive school reforms in schools with diverse characteristics.
  • State – Requires each State to conduct an annual evaluation of the effects of the reforms on student achievement and submit the report to the Secretary.
  • Local – Requires that schools adopt comprehensive reforms that are based on scientifically based research and effective practices and that include a plan for evaluating annually the implementation of the reforms and their effect on student achievement.
Allocation of Funds
  • Federal to State – Formula based on each State’s prior-year share of Title I Basic Grants (Sec. 1124).
  • Within State – Competitive awards to LEAs that receive funds under Part A of Title I, with a priority for LEAs planning to use funds in schools in improvement or corrective action under Title I.
Set-Asides
  • Federal – (1) Up to 1 percent for the BIA and Outlying Areas; (2) up to 1 percent for national evaluation activities; and (3) up to 3 percent for Quality Initiatives.
  • State – Up to 5 percent for administrative, evaluation, and technical assistance expenses.

 

 

Back to Top GIF


Corner fill Gif